Advertisement

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (12) Median Score: 91 points

  • Dinner @ home; 6/4/2015-7/14/2015: Golden-orange color; oxidation, funky aromas, orange citrus peel; palate is full bodied, rounded, but still great acid; medium finish. 88. Could be Chablis >10 years with premox, or possibly Lopez de Heredia with some age but not quite enough complexity.
    Day 2: Much more oxidation, much less pleasurable to drink.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • bottle 61910—730
    First accessing.

    Visual: Clear, bright, medium yellow in the glass with reflections of gold and straw.

    Nose:
    This is not at all what I remember from the last bottle. A bit of reductive stench that took half an hour to blow off. A fair whiff of yeasty/bread-y autolytic leesiness, warm vanilla creme-brulee oak, a bit of overripe apple, with slight oxidation.

    In the mouth it is dead-sexy. Elegantly balanced with ripe apple/lemon-cream fruit, bright acidity, satiny weight, and superbly-integrated bitter-wood oak influence. Alcohol registers as only slightly elevated— not the 14.4% listed on the bottle.

    I love what's happening with the palate, but I'm not sure what's going on with the nose.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Piano shopping with a few wines to boot (SF Wine Center): Bottle 61910729. Second accessing.

    Slightly cloudy
    day bright
    light + gold
    tears - no tears (weird because there’s no alcohol) [How to see tears? Maybe it was a bit cold? Dirty glass?]

    NOSE:
    Sweet, youthful nose
    evidence of oak: vanilla, cream, creme brulee. Light toast.
    Fruits: confected lemon, confected orange.

    PALATE:
    dry
    med+ body
    med+ alcohol
    high acidity - clean, tartaric with some malic character
    some evidence of oak on the palate
    mellow lemon, lemon curd,
    creme brulee is lighter on the palate than on the nose.

    Score: No score (We didn't give this as much time or air as it deserved). Still - it was sweetly-flavored and lovely, with vibrant acidity.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Inaugural Wine Lair tasting with DGH and EH (SF Wine Center): Bottle 61910729, 1st Coravin. (note: in the future, pre-pour around 10 minutes and let it warm up from cellar temperature).

    Medium gold, star-bright in the glass. The nose had initial reductive notes that blew off quickly, giving way to a ridiculously sweet and intense nose of lemon curd, creme brulee, pear, pure vanilla tones, well-integrated oak, also a hint of dissociated wood, secondary trace hints of butterscotch, toffee, and tangerine (all very faint). Despite all these descriptors, the nose wasn’t over-sweet. None of us could resist returning to this over and over again to smell. EH likened the nose to a story of baking a lemon pound cake. First you smell the vanilla, the citrus, the butter, the cream. Then you smell it while baking - warm, expansive notes. Then as it matures in the glass you get more dried sweet aromas. Caramelization.

    In the mouth, medium+ body, medium+ alcohol (14.4%), medium-high acid (very nice clean lactic with a hint of mineral tartness on the finish). On the midpalate, ripe flavors of peach cream (the only hint of the peach yoplait I remember from the ’01) and melon, with well-integrated oak and creme brulee. It lingered on the finish, the secondary non-fruit aromas fading leaving a rich tone of lemon curd along with vibrant acidity. This wine is nervoux, exciting, delicious, well-articulated, and un-complicated. One can deconstruct the reasons why it works so well, or just smell it and sigh. We did a lot of both the former and the latter.
    A stunner of a bottle - despite being from ’02, it presents youthful and fresh. I have no idea what will happen to this with age.
    Score: Between 9 and 9.5

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Deep golden color. Somewhat subdued/closed nose with caramel coming through, but not much fruit. On the palate, stony minerality, with the acid overpowering the fruit a bit too much. Rough on the finish. Past prime, but I wonder how it would have been in it's youth?

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 12 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    January/Feburary 2005, IWC Issue #118, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Hyde De Villaine (HDV) Chardonnay Hyde Vineyard Carneros) Login and sign up and see review text.

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    11/30/2006, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 92 points

    (Hyde De Villaine Chardonnay) From magnum - creamy vanilla nose with banana note; oaky, fresh Cali Chardonnay fruit, with good acidity and mineral and ripe lemon notes; medium finish

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and RJonWine.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×