Bjørnebær, kirsebær, markjordbær, lakris og litt lær. Myk kjøttfull frukt myk sødme/syre struktur. Veldig avslipte taniner, men fortsatt kraft igjen. Nydelig til pannestekt biff og bakt potet, og god i glasset etterpå uten å snerpe.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Medium garnet/brick - ripe summer fruit pudding, spices, prunes, dried figues, smoke, game, leather. Med+ acidity, med- ripe tannins, med+ alcohol, full body, long finish. Outstanding quality, this is drinking beautifully now with lovely mix of primary and tertiary elements. No doubt it will continue to develop - but really up to you depending on how you like your Musar.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Agh what a disappointment. It's inconsistent this wine, to be sure. It's got the classic Musar crazy nose of everything. All the things - blood, iron, spices. Madness. But it's oddly watery and sort of dying. Far inferior to the 2012 but also to the many other 2010s I've had. I'm hoping this was just a dud bottle. The good ones are very good and should last until 2030 easily.
Side note: the Wine society first offered Musar to the nation in 1973, and it was the 1967 vintage.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Fine sweet aroma, slight hint of spice, then cedar and squashed blueberries. Then on the tongue, complexity, dates then raisin, a dryness and then a long hit of chilli heat and tannis with some dry leather grip, but quite soft not aggressive. Finish is v long, more spice, toasted tobacco and soft fruit, raspberry not strawberry. Can age more I think, get deeper tannins and softer.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
5/25/2024 - finewinebuff57 wrote: 91 Points
By the glass. A great Musar just getting into its slide. Plenty of time in hand. This score will rise.91
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/27/2024 - Casa HeRo wrote: 93 Points
Bjørnebær, kirsebær, markjordbær, lakris og litt lær. Myk kjøttfull frukt myk sødme/syre struktur. Veldig avslipte taniner, men fortsatt kraft igjen. Nydelig til pannestekt biff og bakt potet, og god i glasset etterpå uten å snerpe.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/29/2023 - Andrewbdc wrote: 92 Points
Medium garnet/brick - ripe summer fruit pudding, spices, prunes, dried figues, smoke, game, leather. Med+ acidity, med- ripe tannins, med+ alcohol, full body, long finish. Outstanding quality, this is drinking beautifully now with lovely mix of primary and tertiary elements. No doubt it will continue to develop - but really up to you depending on how you like your Musar.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/22/2023 - ricard wrote:
Agh what a disappointment. It's inconsistent this wine, to be sure. It's got the classic Musar crazy nose of everything. All the things - blood, iron, spices. Madness. But it's oddly watery and sort of dying. Far inferior to the 2012 but also to the many other 2010s I've had. I'm hoping this was just a dud bottle. The good ones are very good and should last until 2030 easily.
Side note: the Wine society first offered Musar to the nation in 1973, and it was the 1967 vintage.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/9/2023 - lloyd.cochrane@googlemail.com Likes this wine: 92 Points
Fine sweet aroma, slight hint of spice, then cedar and squashed blueberries. Then on the tongue, complexity, dates then raisin, a dryness and then a long hit of chilli heat and tannis with some dry leather grip, but quite soft not aggressive. Finish is v long, more spice, toasted tobacco and soft fruit, raspberry not strawberry. Can age more I think, get deeper tannins and softer.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment