2020 Schramsberg Vineyards Brut Rosé

Community Tasting Notes (1) Avg Score: 90.7 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View mouton45's profile
  • Report Issue

  3/29/2024 - mouton45 wrote: 90 Points

  IMHO, the 2020 lagged well behind the 2019, which I rated 93 on Feb. 28. Schramsberg is one of my top 5 favorite California sparkllng wine makers.. It always has and always will produce a very good sparkler, and this 2020 was definitely drinkable with our impromptu dinner of organic pork and chicken mousse pate from Whole Foods and Costco's Kirkland double cream brie imported from Normandy.
  
  The 2020 exhiibited a volcanic eruption-like of bubbles in the glass from the first pour to the last sip. It offered a variety of floral notes and fruity flavors, and went well with the pate and cheese.
  
  I respect WS and WE for the 93s they awards to the 202. But to me, it wasn't as good as the 1999, and I wondered why.
  
  My guess why comes from Antonio Galloni's Viintage Chart for 2020 Sonoma PN (Schramsberg's grapes for its rose are sourced from North Coast vineyards from Mendocino to Marin counties, and in the case of the 2020. (which is 72% PN and 28% chard, according to the producer's website), 67% on the pinot came from Sonoma.
  
  Here's what Galloni said about Sonoma PN for that vintage :
  
  Year: 2020
  Score: 78
  Recommendation: Drink Now
  
  Two-thousand twenty is an especially difficult vintage for Pinot Noir. Rampant wildfires and smoke presented huge challenges. Some wines were completely lost to smoke taint and were not bottled at all. In other cases, winemakers were able to accelerate harvest and salvage some of the crop. The dramatic conditions of the year resulted in highly variable wines. It is a vintage that requires extreme selection. I would not push my luck on aging. (08/23, AG).
  
  FWIW: Vinous hasn't issued a rating on the 2020 Sonoma pinots as yet. It rated the 2019's as 93. Not wishing to get into any discussion on the validity of scores in general and professional reviewers in particular, I'm OK the two pro assessments of the 2020 Schramsberg But Rose posted so far. Everyone has a right to their opinion.
  
  Right or wrong, I just saying that to ME it tasted distinctly different from the 2019, which is not uncommon with all the varietals.
  
  WS rated the 2020 North Coast pinot vintage at 87 and said: "A year to forget for many Northern California producers, with a number of them not releasing wines because of challenging weather conditions, capped by wildfires during harvest leading to issues of smoke taint."
  
  WA scored N.C. pinots 80 I - I for "irregular, even among the best wines."
  
  Sounds pretty consistent to me, I guess.
  
  Last word on this from me (thank God, right!): I bought 3 bottles of the 2020 rose a few months ago. Despite the caveat-emptor alerts from V, WS and WA, I plan to roll the dice and hold on to the other two bottles to drink other the next couple years. My score of 90 FW is not a terrible one, and other tasters already have or may see it differently, which is perfectly fine.
  
  And considering the terrible wildfires that hit many vineyards and wineries, Schramsberg made, as usual, the best sparkler they could with what they had to work with. Bravo for their efforts. That's one reason they remain in my top 5.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.